Is “trigger-happy” litigation in private antitrust actions ending in Spain?

๐— ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ต ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป – As commented on many other occasions, private antitrust litigation in Spain is quite complex and far from a sure claim to be won. If recently it was in the case of the so-called ‘๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—น’, now it is the turn of the ‘๐—บ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ธ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—น’ with a new ruling against the claimant. 

Unlike the criteria of the Spanish competition watchdog, the CNMC, the courts are favourable to the dairy industry. The latest case: ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—™๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ก๐—ผ๐Ÿฎ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—Ÿ๐˜‚๐—ด๐—ผ, ๐—š๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ, one the main areas in the dairy industry.

As mentioned in the attached article, the court has dismissed the lawsuit filed by a farmer for โ‚ฌ๐Ÿญ.๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿฏ ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป against several companies in the sector for allegedly anticompetitive conduct sanctioned by the CNMC.

Interestingly, the court also ordered the farmer to ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜€, including the costs incurred by the defendants in hiring lawyers, experts and attorneys.

The ruling is a significant setback for the claimants in addition to other similar judgments that have also ruled against the farmers, such as the judgment of the Commercial Court of Oviedo number 1, dated January 20, 2022, and the decision issued, also, by the Court of First Instance number 2 of Lugo, last June 3, 2022.

๐—œ๐˜€ “๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฟ-๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐˜†” ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป?

Read the quoted article, published in elEconomista.es here

Share:
Scroll to Top