{"id":3988,"date":"2022-02-13T11:15:36","date_gmt":"2022-02-13T10:15:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/?p=3988"},"modified":"2023-04-18T18:33:47","modified_gmt":"2023-04-18T16:33:47","slug":"icsid-arbitration-plus-de-liaisons-dangereuses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/en\/icsid-arbitration-plus-de-liaisons-dangereuses\/","title":{"rendered":"ICSID Arbitration &#8211; Plus de liaisons dangereuses?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Spanish electricity company Orazul International Espa\u00f1a Holdings S.L.&nbsp;loses its disqualification proposal against the presiding arbitrator Inka Hanefeld&nbsp;in a dispute against Rep\u00fablica Argentina.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Spaniards alleged that she failed to disclose her relationship with Argentina&#8217;s legal expert Prof. Jorge Vi\u00f1uales on the tribunal&nbsp;that issued the notorious award in the &#8216;Green Power&#8217; case against the Kingdom of Spain in 2022, where both were co-arbitrators in the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce arbitration (Green Power Partners K\/S, SCE Solar Don Benito APS v. the Kingdom of Spain).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Many will recall that this &#8217;cause c\u00e9l\u00e8bre&#8217; was brought by the Danish investor group Green Power Partners against Spain. The decision was the first time an arbitration tribunal declined a claim based on an intra-EU jurisdictional objection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Accordingly, the claimant in this arbitration against Argentina, Orazul, alleges that although Vi\u00f1uales is acting as Argentina&#8217;s expert in the present case, \ud835\uddd7\ud835\uddff \ud835\udddb\ud835\uddee\ud835\uddfb\ud835\uddf2\ud835\uddf3\ud835\uddf2\ud835\uddf9\ud835\uddf1\u2019\ud835\ude00 \ud835\uddf0\ud835\uddfc\ud835\uddfb\ud835\uddf1\ud835\ude02\ud835\uddf0\ud835\ude01 \ud835\uddf1\ud835\ude02\ud835\uddff\ud835\uddf6\ud835\uddfb\ud835\uddf4 \ud835\ude01\ud835\uddf5\ud835\uddf2 \ud835\udddb\ud835\uddf2\ud835\uddee\ud835\uddff\ud835\uddf6\ud835\uddfb\ud835\uddf4 \ud835\uddf5\ud835\uddee\ud835\ude00 \ud835\uddf0\ud835\uddfc\ud835\uddfb\ud835\uddf3\ud835\uddf6\ud835\uddff\ud835\uddfa\ud835\uddf2\ud835\uddf1 \ud835\uddf5\ud835\uddf2\ud835\uddff \ud835\uddef\ud835\uddf6\ud835\uddee\ud835\ude00 \ud835\ude01\ud835\uddfc\ud835\ude04\ud835\uddee\ud835\uddff\ud835\uddf1\ud835\ude00 \ud835\uddd4\ud835\uddff\ud835\uddf4\ud835\uddf2\ud835\uddfb\ud835\ude01\ud835\uddf6\ud835\uddfb\ud835\uddee, \ud835\uddfc\ud835\uddff \ud835\uddee\ud835\ude01 \ud835\ude01\ud835\uddf5\ud835\uddf2 \ud835\ude03\ud835\uddf2\ud835\uddff\ud835\ude06 \ud835\uddf9\ud835\uddf2\ud835\uddee\ud835\ude00\ud835\ude01, \ud835\uddf5\ud835\uddf2\ud835\uddff \ud835\uddf9\ud835\uddee\ud835\uddf0\ud835\uddf8 \ud835\uddfc\ud835\uddf3 \ud835\uddf6\ud835\uddfa\ud835\uddfd\ud835\uddee\ud835\uddff\ud835\ude01\ud835\uddf6\ud835\uddee\ud835\uddf9\ud835\uddf6\ud835\ude01\ud835\ude06 \ud835\ude04\ud835\uddf6\ud835\ude01\ud835\uddf5 \ud835\uddff\ud835\uddf2\ud835\ude00\ud835\uddfd\ud835\uddf2\ud835\uddf0\ud835\ude01 \ud835\ude01\ud835\uddfc \ud835\uddd6\ud835\uddf9\ud835\uddee\ud835\uddf6\ud835\uddfa\ud835\uddee\ud835\uddfb\ud835\ude01.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In its decision, the rest of the ICSID tribunal considered that even though the &#8216;Green Power&#8217; award became public in late June, Orazul waited until September to complain about Hanefeld&#8217;s failure to disclose her connection to Vi\u00f1uales.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Furthermore, according to the arbitrators, &#8220;the questioning by Dr. Hanefeld, taken in the whole context of the hearing, does not rise to the level of bias or dependence,&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Interestingly they admit a preferable technique by their fellow arbitrator: &#8220;We agree that it is preferable for an arbitrator to put questions in an open, rather than a conclusory, manner. But, we do not accept the claimant&#8217;s contention that Dr. Hanefeld&#8217;s manner of questioning showed a bias or pre-judgement.&#8221; (!)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, among other reasons, the arbitrators decline the proposed disqualification of Dr. Hanefeld under Articles 57 and<br>14(1) of the ICSID Convention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>May the close relations of the &#8220;regulars&#8221; in investment arbitration remain a cause for concern or, even worse, a source of mistrust?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Spanish electricity company Orazul International Espa\u00f1a Holdings S.L.&nbsp;loses its disqualification proposal against the presiding arbitrator Inka Hanefeld&nbsp;in a dispute against [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":4007,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"wds_primary_category":19,"footnotes":""},"categories":[82],"tags":[108,117,90],"ppma_author":[54],"class_list":["post-3988","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-disputes","tag-competition-litigation-en","tag-international-arbitration-en","tag-josep-galvez"],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/pexels-\u0434\u043c\u0438\u0442\u0440\u0438\u0438\u0306-\u0442\u0440\u0435\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0438\u0306-8566772.jpeg",1280,905,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/pexels-\u0434\u043c\u0438\u0442\u0440\u0438\u0438\u0306-\u0442\u0440\u0435\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0438\u0306-8566772-150x150.jpeg",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/pexels-\u0434\u043c\u0438\u0442\u0440\u0438\u0438\u0306-\u0442\u0440\u0435\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0438\u0306-8566772-300x212.jpeg",300,212,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/pexels-\u0434\u043c\u0438\u0442\u0440\u0438\u0438\u0306-\u0442\u0440\u0435\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0438\u0306-8566772-768x543.jpeg",768,543,true],"large":["https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/pexels-\u0434\u043c\u0438\u0442\u0440\u0438\u0438\u0306-\u0442\u0440\u0435\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0438\u0306-8566772-1024x724.jpeg",1024,724,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/pexels-\u0434\u043c\u0438\u0442\u0440\u0438\u0438\u0306-\u0442\u0440\u0435\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0438\u0306-8566772.jpeg",1280,905,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/pexels-\u0434\u043c\u0438\u0442\u0440\u0438\u0438\u0306-\u0442\u0440\u0435\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0438\u0306-8566772.jpeg",1280,905,false]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Josep G\u00e1lvez","author_link":"https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/en\/author\/josepgalvez\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Spanish electricity company Orazul International Espa\u00f1a Holdings S.L.&nbsp;loses its disqualification proposal against the presiding arbitrator Inka Hanefeld&nbsp;in a dispute against [&hellip;]","authors":[{"term_id":54,"user_id":10,"is_guest":0,"slug":"josepgalvez","display_name":"Josep G\u00e1lvez","avatar_url":{"url":"https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/josep-galvez-litigo-partner-1-e1666195645370.jpg","url2x":"https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/josep-galvez-litigo-partner-1-e1666195645370.jpg"},"1":"","2":"","3":"","4":"","5":"","6":"","7":"","8":""}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3988","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3988"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3988\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6394,"href":"https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3988\/revisions\/6394"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4007"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3988"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3988"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3988"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/litigopartners.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=3988"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}